How many drug dealers get caught
All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Assistant U. Attorneys Lindsey Beran and Nicole Dana are prosecuting the case. You are here U. Attorneys » Northern District of Texas » News. Department of Justice. Police use drug dealers as informants because the method is significantly more effective than anything else. These are the people that are operating in the world the police want to know about; they experience it first-hand on a regular basis.
No matter how much technical investigation there is, the police are rarely aware of the personal interactions between the players.
Criminal defendants are highly motivated and take significant real life risks to maintain their freedom. In any case, criminal defense attorneys are necessary to assist defendants with the legal process. If you or someone you know has been charged with a drug crime, contact our Rochester drug crime lawyer for a free consultation to discuss the situation and find out what approach we recommend.
Attorney Robert King has significant experience in jury trials and, as a former prosecutor, brings an intimate knowledge of criminal law to every case. Who Investigates Drug Crimes? Here are some examples of techniques law enforcement officials use: Drug investigators use pole cameras to monitor suspects coming and going for their homes, work or other important locations. Vigorous Defense for Drug Offenses In any case, criminal defense attorneys are necessary to assist defendants with the legal process.
There is no fixed amount that can be said to be for personal use — if you are caught in possession of a particularly large amount of drugs then the police may think that it is too much for your own needs and you could be charged with an offence of possession with intent to supply drugs, which is much more serious.
The amount of drugs you have in your possession might suggest to the police and prosecution that you are intending to supply them to someone else. However, the amount on its own is not normally enough evidence and the police will always look at what else is found with the drugs, or at your home.
If other things that are regularly involved in the supply of drugs are also found, this may suggest that you have the intention to sell or supply drugs. Even if caught with a small quantity of drugs statements given by you can be used in evidence; for example, if you say to the police you were holding a ecstasy pill for a friend this could be used to establish intention to supply.
The amount of drugs is less important if you are caught actually supplying them. Even if you only supply a tiny amount of drugs to someone, you could still be charged with the offence. The Police will look for the same sort of evidence as for PWITS, but because actual supply needs to have taken place they will also use other types of evidence.
This could be CCTV or hidden cameras, or there may be undercover officers in places where drug supply is known to happen. A common example would be in the car of a suspect.
These recordings are allowed to be used as evidence in court. However, the police are not allowed to intercept telephone conversations. Undercover officers might pretend to be a person buying drugs to prove that someone is selling drugs. The undercover officer will usually have a hidden camera or microphone on them and the deal will be recorded.
Any evidence found in this way could be rejected by the Court. However, an undercover officer is allowed to give someone an opportunity to commit an offence by asking them to sell drugs.
If someone agrees to this and sells drugs to an undercover officer then this is not entrapment. The police might look at telephone or computer evidence to prove that a person has the intention to supply drugs or has actually sold them.
It is possible to access deleted messages and the police may even download photos saved on the phone to see if there is any evidence of drug supply.
0コメント